SEC vs Ripple: Judge Asks SEC to Surrender Hinman Email On Ether

Share IT

Key Takeaways:

  • The Court asks SEC to reveal Hinmanโ€™s email regarding Ethereum to Ripple.ย 
  • SECsโ€™ arguments regarding the documents were partly agreed to and partly denied.ย 
  • XRP is yet to be determined as security.ย 
Sec Vs Ripple: Judge Asks Sec To Surrender Hinman Email On Ether
SEC vs Ripple: Judge Asks SEC to Surrender Hinman Email On Ether

The crypto industry dodges a blow on Thursday as Ripple wins a critical procedural victory against Security and Exchange Commission (SEC). The federal judge ruled that the SEC will have to disclose the emails concerning the 2018 speech regarding Ethereum, earlier marked as privileged documents by the SEC. 

The battle started when SEC claimed that Ripple had been selling unregistered securities. The news not only soiled Rippleโ€™s reputation but also incinerated half of the 28 billion dollar market value of XRP (a cryptocurrency bound to Ripple). To this incident, Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple Labs, said, โ€œIโ€™ve always viewed myself as one of the good guys in Silicon Valley who does whatโ€™s rightโ€”only to have the U.S government assert in an inflammatory way youโ€™re playing dirty.โ€

The speech that caused this mayhem was delivered by former top SEC official William Hinman, who stated Ethereum is a threat as it is amply decentralised. Referring to this speech, SEC argued in the court that Ripple and its top executives sold XRP to the public without registering it. 

U.S Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn ruled the session and โ€œgrantedโ€ the motion in part and โ€œdeniedโ€ in part. It agreed with the SEC regarding certain documents and rejected the agencyโ€™s argument not to disclose more than a dozen documents. The court stated, โ€œAlthough Hinman and the SEC admit that agency staff discussed his speech, it appears that this speech was ‘merely peripheral to actual policy formation,’ Tigue, 312 F.3d at 80, and not an ‘essential link’ in the SECโ€™s deliberative process with respect to Ether, Grand Cent. Pโ€™ship, 166 F.3d at 482. Accordingly, emails concerning the speech or draft versions are neither pre-decisional nor deliberative agency documents entitled to protection.โ€

Though this will provide some clarity in the case of SEC vs Ripple, it is only procedural. Crypto investors are still awaiting the decision regarding XRP, which is yet to be declared as security. 

Share IT
Shreya Bhattacharya
Shreya Bhattacharya

A journalist & writer exploring new topics every day!

Can’t find what you’re looking for? Type below and hit enter!