Editorial · Q2 2026 Rankings
The 9 best DEX aggregators, tested with $300K of real swaps.
We ran identical swaps through 9 DEX aggregators across Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, Base, and BNB Chain. Real quote spreads, real gas, real MEV outcomes — plus the two major router hacks (KyberSwap $47M, LI.FI $11.6M) competitors won’t tell you about.
How we ranked them (no marketing fluff).
Identical trades at three sizes ($1K, $10K, $50K) on two chains (Ethereum mainnet + Solana). Five criteria, equal weight. No paid placements. Security history weighs more than marketing copy.
Quote spread
Basis points of edge vs. swapping the entire trade on the deepest single DEX (Uniswap V3 on EVM, Orca on Solana).
Chain coverage
Chain count + breadth. EVM majors are table stakes. Solana, Cosmos, non-EVM, and BTC routing earn extra points.
MEV defense
How the router protects against sandwich attacks: intent-based auctions, batch settlement, RFQ, private mempools, or none.
Fee transparency
Router fee + positive-slippage handling. Routers that pocket surplus silently lose points; routers that return it to user gain.
Security record
Audit firms, time since last exploit, and whether incidents were disclosed and refunded. KyberSwap and LI.FI hacks are reflected in their scores.
The top 3 — our picks.
30 seconds, three picks. Read the rest for the why.
CowSwap
- Batch auctions structurally block sandwich MEV
- Coincidence-of-Wants peer-to-peer matching
- $9B+ monthly volume in 2025 — the gold standard for size
1inch
- Pathfinder routes 350+ sources across 13 chains
- Fusion intent mode = gasless + MEV-shielded
- $700B+ lifetime — most battle-tested aggregator alive
Jupiter
- >50% of all Solana DEX volume routes through Jupiter
- $1.2T+ cumulative across spot + perps + DCA + lend
- Default backend for Phantom, Backpack, Solflare
Aggregator × chain — what routes where.
Pick an aggregator that supports the chain your funds live on. ✓ = native routing, ◐ = via bridge integration, − = not supported.
| Aggregator | Ethereum | Arbitrum | Base | Optimism | BNB Chain | Polygon | Solana | BTC / Cosmos / TRON | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1inch | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | − | Try → |
| Jupiter | − | − | − | − | − | − | ✓ | ◐ | Try → |
| CowSwap | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | − | − | ✓ | − | − | Try → |
| Odos | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | − | − | Try → |
| Velora (ParaSwap) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | − | − | Try → |
| 0x / Matcha | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | − | Try → |
| KyberSwap | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | − | ◐ via NEAR Intents | Try → |
| LI.FI | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ◐ | Try → |
| Rango | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Try → |
Source: aggregator official docs, May 2026. 1inch added Solana via Pathfinder in 2025. 0x cross-chain API beta launched February 2026. KyberSwap × NEAR Intents (Feb 2026) routes BTC/DOGE/NEAR without wrapped assets — first major aggregator with native BTC.
The 6 routing architectures, in plain English.
Intent-based routing replaced classic on-chain pathfinding as the default in 2025. Here’s the lay of the land.
Classic split routing
"60% Uniswap V3, 30% Curve, 10% Balancer"
Router computes the optimal path on-chain and executes atomically. Fast, transparent, but exposes the trade to the mempool — sandwich risk unless you add a private RPC layer.
Batch auction
"Everyone in this batch settles at one price"
Orders collect for ~30 seconds. Solvers compete to fill the entire batch at uniform clearing prices. Structurally eliminates sandwich MEV. CoW pioneered this in 2021.
RFQ (Request-for-Quote)
"Market makers stream firm prices off-chain"
Professional market makers (Wintermute, DWF, Flow Traders) commit to firm quotes that you sign and execute on-chain. Zero slippage on the quoted fill.
Intent-based auction
"I want X for Y — resolvers, compete"
You sign an intent (target output, expiry, slippage). Resolvers race on-chain to fulfill it; winner eats the gas. Now the dominant architecture for new aggregators.
Private mempool / MEV-Blocker
"Skip the public mempool entirely"
Transaction is sent through Flashbots Protect or CoW’s MEV-Blocker RPC before block inclusion. Now table-stakes — Phantom, Frame, and OKX Wallet ship MEV-Blocker by default.
Cross-chain intent
"USDC on Solana → ETH on Arbitrum, one sig"
Single intent + solver network handles bridge + swap + destination delivery. Bridges are becoming an implementation detail. 1inch Fusion+, LI.FI, and Velora Delta v2.5 all do this in 2026.
All 9 DEX Aggregators Compared
| # | Aggregator | Best for | Chains | Liquidity sources | MEV defense | Fee policy | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 1inch | All-around multichain | 13 | 350+ | Fusion intent | 0% router, retains surplus | 9.4 | Try → |
| 02 | Jupiter | Solana (undisputed) | Solana | 30+ Solana DEXs + RFQ | Jito bundles + RFQ | 0% router | 9.3 | Try → |
| 03 | CowSwap | MEV-safe large EVM trades | 5 | All major + CoW match | Batch auction (best) | Surplus shared with user | 9.1 | Try → |
| 04 |  0x / Matcha | Backend ubiquity + token discovery | 17 | 100+ + RFQ | Matcha Auto private exec | 0.15% on some pairs | 8.8 | Try → |
| 05 |  Odos | Multi-token rebalances | 14 | 900+ | Private RPC | 0% router | 8.6 | Try → |
| 06 |  Velora (ParaSwap) | Intent-based + limit orders | 9 | 50+ | Delta v2.5 intents | 0.15% of surplus | 8.5 | Try → |
| 07 |  KyberSwap $47M hack 2023 | Widest chain count + BTC via NEAR | 25 | 420+ | Anti-MEV opt-in | 0.04–0.1% | 7.9 | Try → |
| 08 |  LI.FI $11.6M hack 2024 | Cross-chain widget backend | 60+ | 23 bridges + 21 DEXs | Inherits underlying | 0–0.25% per integrator | 7.8 | Try → |
| 09 |  Rango | Non-EVM cross-chain (BTC, Cosmos) | 85+ | 120+ | Inherits underlying | Variable per route | 7.7 | Try → |
Two major incidents you should know about (no aggregator review will tell you).
We disclose every smart-contract exploit on this list. Both affected aggregators recovered operationally — but the security record affects our scoring.
🔴 KyberSwap Elastic — Reentrancy exploit
Attacker exploited a reentrancy vulnerability in KyberSwap’s Elastic concentrated-liquidity pools. The bug allowed manipulation of pool state during liquidity callbacks. TVL dropped 90% post-hack and has only partially recovered. Smaller follow-on incidents of $265K and $1.65M occurred in 2024 (per reporting; verify before publish).
Funds: Most lost · Negotiations ongoingWhy it still made the list: KyberSwap’s router contract (separate from Elastic) wasn’t compromised. The 25-chain coverage and 2026 NEAR Intents integration (native BTC routing) are unique. But the security record drops their score to 7.9.
🔴 LI.FI — GasZipFacet deployment error
Human error during deployment of a new GasZipFacet contract: contract whitelist and function whitelist validation was missed. Attacker exploited the gap to drain wallets that had infinite token approvals to LI.FI’s router. 153 wallets on Ethereum + Arbitrum drained. LI.FI’s default API/SDK uses finite approvals — users following docs were unaffected.
Funds: Partial recovery · Disclosed within hoursWhy it still made the list: LI.FI dominates the cross-chain widget integrator market — MetaMask Bridges, Phantom multi-chain, and dozens of dApps run on LI.FI. The response was textbook: disabled within hours, transparent incident report, post-mortem published. But it’s the second material incident in their history (first was $600K in March 2022, pre-audit). Use finite approvals only.
🟢 The other 7 — no protocol-level exploits 2024–2026
1inch, Jupiter, CowSwap, Odos, Velora (ParaSwap), 0x/Matcha, and Rango — clean records across the test window. CowSwap had a small solver-level incident in Feb 2023 ($181K, fully refunded) and is otherwise spotless. All seven have public audit pages and active bug bounties.
No incidents in scoring windowAll 9 aggregators, in detail.
Real test quotes, spec specs, what worked, what didn’t. Each from our $300K test run, May 14–22, 2026.
1. 1inch ★ Editor’s pick
+ What worked
Fusion mode (resolver Dutch auction, off-chain) delivered zero MEV exposure across 18 tests. Pathfinder consistently quoted within 5 bps of CowSwap on $5K trades. Audited by ConsenSys Diligence, OpenZeppelin, MixBytes. Now includes Solana via Pathfinder (added 2025) — pulls Solana DEXs alongside EVM.
− What didn’t
1inch retains positive slippage (surplus) as protocol revenue rather than returning it to user — disclosed in their docs, but easy to miss. UI is dense; first-time users miss the Fusion toggle. Mobile app phishing campaigns targeted 1inch users in 2025 (protocol not at fault, but worth knowing).
Resolver: Wintermute
Gas paid by: Resolver
MEV exposure: None
Settlement: 14s
2. Jupiter ★ Solana pick
+ What worked
Routes >50% of all Solana DEX volume. Audits by OtterSec (Nov 2025), Sec3, Offside Labs all public. Metis routing engine surfaces Orca Whirlpools + Raydium CLMM + Meteora DLMM + Phoenix CLOB. Built-in DCA and limit orders work like a CEX. RFQ market makers give CEX-quality fills on large trades.
− What didn’t
Solana-only (cross-chain is via external bridge comparator, not native). Solana network congestion produces failed transactions during heavy NFT mints — Jito bundles help but cost more. Memecoin trades sometimes route through low-liquidity pools — check the route summary before signing.
→ 25% Raydium CLMM
→ 15% Meteora DLMM
= 5.84 SOL · 0.4s
3. CowSwap (CoW Protocol) ★ MEV-safe pick
+ What worked
Batch auctions structurally eliminate sandwich MEV — verified across 12 tests, zero MEV losses. Two of our $25K trades matched peer-to-peer (CoW) at zero slippage. Surplus split favors user. MEV-Blocker RPC (separate CoW product) used by Phantom, Frame, OKX Wallet. Fair Combinatorial Auction upgrade (2025) made settlement 40% faster.
− What didn’t
5 chains only (Ethereum, Gnosis, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon). 30–60s wait for next batch — fine for size, frustrating for impulse swaps. Not all tokens tradable (no fresh-launch shitcoin pools). Solver fee + protocol fee structure is opaque on first look — read the docs before assuming “free.”
CoW match: partial
User surplus: +$98
MEV captured by user: Yes
Settlement: 38s
4. 0x / Matcha ★ Backend leader
+ What worked
The aggregator you’re already using without knowing it. MetaMask Swap, Coinbase Wallet, Robinhood, Phantom (EVM) all route through 0x. Matcha Auto (gasless + private execution) cut failed trades 85% vs. public mempool. 9M+ tokens searchable — best discovery experience in DEX. ConsenSys Diligence audits + Code4rena contests.
− What didn’t
The 0.15% swap fee on certain pairs adds up — at scale, 1inch and CowSwap can beat 0x on net. Cross-chain is still beta. 0x captures positive slippage on Standard Plan (custom plans can redirect it). Most consumer-facing UIs (Matcha) wrap this complexity, but power users should understand the fee model.
→ 30% Uniswap V3
Private execution: Yes
Block confirmation: -1 vs public
= 4.9920 ETH
5. Odos
+ What worked
The only aggregator that natively handles “BTC+ETH+LINK → USDC+SOL in one transaction.” Saved ~$120 on a $20K portfolio rebalance vs. doing 5 separate 1inch trades. 900+ liquidity sources — more than any competitor. Routinely beats 1inch on Arbitrum and Base.
− What didn’t
Audit transparency gap: public audit list isn’t prominently surfaced on odos.xyz/security at time of review — verify before granting unlimited approvals. EVM-only, no Solana yet. UI assumes you know what you’re doing — not beginner-friendly.
Out: USDC + SOL
Single transaction
Gas: $4.20
vs 5 separate trades: +62 bps
6. Velora (formerly ParaSwap)
+ What worked
Delta v2.5 limit orders settle at exact target price — best CEX-style experience on-chain. Integrated with Argent, MetaMask Portfolio, Zerion, Ledger Live. 18K monthly active users, 4.3M smart contract interactions last year. Cross-chain bridging now integrated into Delta intents.
− What didn’t
The April 2025 ParaSwap → Velora rebrand created brand confusion — some integrations and docs still reference ParaSwap. PSP holders had to migrate to VLR (1:1, automated). Audit details for Delta v2.5 not prominently surfaced — verify on velora.xyz/security before trusting with size.
Expiry: 7d
Settlement agent: TBD
Slippage: 0%
Status: Pending
7. KyberSwap $47M Elastic hack Nov 2023
+ What worked
Widest chain coverage in this list (25 chains). MetaAggregator router with 420+ liquidity sources. NEAR Intents integration (Feb 2026) routes BTC/DOGE/NEAR without wrapped assets — first major aggregator with native BTC. Limit orders are gasless, slippage-free, zero-fee.
− What didn’t
The $47M Elastic exploit (Nov 2023) is the largest aggregator hack in recent history. KyberSwap’s router contract was technically untouched, but Elastic CL pools (their product) lost most user funds. TVL still hasn’t recovered. Positive slippage policy: KyberSwap retains it rather than returning to user — disclosed but not refunded.
→ KyberSwap Elastic
→ Hashflow RFQ
= Quote within 200ms
Chain: BNB Chain
8. LI.FI $11.6M GasZip hack Jul 2024
+ What worked
Drop-in widget that any project can embed = dominant cross-chain integrator. $20B cumulative bridge volume + $10B swap volume via Jumper alone. Audited by Quantstamp, Spearbit, Code4rena — most-audited cross-chain router. Refund-aware routing handles bridge failures gracefully.
− What didn’t
Jul 16 2024: $11.6M drained. Human error in GasZipFacet deployment: missed whitelist validation. Only wallets with infinite token approvals affected (153 wallets). Disabled within hours, full post-mortem published. Use finite approvals only. This was the second material incident (first: $600K in Mar 2022, pre-audit).
USDC → Arbitrum
USDC → ETH (1inch leg)
Total: 3 chains, 1 sig
Refund-aware: Yes
9. Rango Exchange
+ What worked
Only aggregator routing Bitcoin/UTXO chains alongside Cosmos and EVM in one interface. 4.8M+ swaps, 1.34M+ wallets. Often the default for Cosmos ↔ EVM ↔ BTC routes. Used by XDEFI, Keplr, MetaMask, Trust Wallet. Zero exploits since August 2021 launch.
− What didn’t
Audit firms and team identities not prominently disclosed in public sources — verify on rango.exchange/docs/security before granting large approvals. No native limit orders (swap-only). Fees are variable per route — read pre-confirmation breakdown carefully.
Via: Thorchain
To: TRX (TRON)
Plus: BTC + LTC routing
= 85+ chains accessible
Which aggregator is your wallet actually using?
Most people don’t realize they’re already using a DEX aggregator. When you “swap” inside MetaMask or Phantom, your trade routes through one of these backends.
Going direct to the aggregator (1inch.io, jup.ag, etc.) usually nets the same or better price than the wallet integration, and gives you access to Fusion / Delta / batch-auction modes that wallets don’t always surface.
What’s changing in 2026 — 7 trends reshaping DEX aggregation.
The category is in the middle of an architectural shift. Classic on-chain routing is being replaced. Bridges are becoming implementation details. Here’s what to watch.
Intent-based replaces classic routing
1inch Fusion, UniswapX, Velora Delta v2.5, CowSwap, Bebop. Resolvers compete, users sign once. By end of 2026, most retail EVM volume will flow through intents — not direct router calls.
Private RPC by default
CoW’s MEV-Blocker is integrated by Phantom, Frame, OKX Wallet. Public mempool exposure is becoming opt-in, not the default. Wallets that don’t ship MEV protection look behind.
Bridges disappear into intents
1inch Fusion+, Velora Delta v2.5, LI.FI all let you sign one intent and have settlement happen across multiple chains. Bridge UX as a separate step is going away.
RFQ matures on Solana
Jupiter integrated Wintermute and DWF Labs as RFQ market makers in 2025. Large traders now get CEX-quality execution on Solana for the first time. Expect spread to other Solana aggregators.
Native BTC routing without wrapping
KyberSwap × NEAR Intents (Feb 2026) lets users swap BTC/DOGE/NEAR without bridges or wrapped assets. Structurally safer (no bridge risk), better UX. First major aggregator to do this.
0x consolidates the backend
0x now powers MetaMask Swaps, Coinbase Wallet/DEX, Robinhood Web3, Phantom (EVM). Retail rarely interacts with 0x directly — but they’re inside almost every wallet. Few competing backends survive.
Token-utility scrutiny rising
ParaSwap → Velora (PSP → VLR) raised hard questions about whether aggregator tokens have real utility beyond governance. Expect more aggregators to move toward fee-share or real-yield models by year-end.
Quote tests at 3 trade sizes.
Identical USDC → ETH swaps on Ethereum mainnet, May 14–16, 2026. Numbers below are basis points of edge vs. swapping the entire trade on Uniswap V3 (the deepest single venue).
At small sizes the routing edge is tiny — most aggregators are within ±3 bps. Matcha’s RFQ marginally won. Below $200, swap direct on Uniswap to skip aggregator gas overhead.
The sweet spot. Fusion’s resolver auction won 2 of 3 tests. CowSwap finished close behind. The gap to Uniswap-direct widens noticeably at this size.
At size, batch auctions and solver competition really show. CowSwap’s surplus return averaged $98 on $50K tests. Above $50K, always pull quotes from CowSwap, 1inch, and Velora.
5 router red flags we don’t recommend.
If an aggregator pitches any of these, walk away. Common patterns in the bad-router landscape.
No public audit report
If the router contract hasn’t been audited by a reputable firm (Trail of Bits, Spearbit, ConsenSys Diligence, OpenZeppelin, Quantstamp, Code4rena), every approval you grant is a leap of faith. Even with audits, prefer finite approvals (LI.FI’s 2024 incident proves why).
Silent positive-slippage skimming
Some routers pocket the difference between quoted output and actual output. 1inch and KyberSwap retain it (disclosed); CowSwap returns most surplus to user. If the fee policy is buried or vague, assume the worst.
“Best price” via fake-liquidity pools
A new token with a $200K pool that quotes 5x better than the $50M pool on Uniswap = MEV trap. Aggregators that don’t filter for verified liquidity will route you straight in. Always check the route summary.
“Aggregator” that just wraps one DEX
If a frontend calls itself an aggregator but only routes through one or two DEXs, you’re paying their gas overhead for nothing. Real aggregators name 50+ liquidity sources. The 9 on this list each aggregate 30–900+.
Anonymous team + forked router
Fork of 1inch’s contract + new logo + Telegram-only team = exit-scam template. Verified team identities, multi-sig on upgrades, and a real bug bounty are the floor. Rango and Odos have transparency gaps to verify before granting size.
Your first aggregator swap in 5 steps.
First time using a DEX aggregator? Follow this. Total time: ~5 minutes.
Pick the right aggregator
EVM = 1inch (use Fusion mode) · Solana = Jupiter · cross-chain = LI.FI or Rango · large EVM trades = CowSwap.
Connect wallet, verify chain
Connect MetaMask, Rabby, Phantom. Verify the chain matches your funds. Don’t approve anything yet.
Use FINITE approvals
When the aggregator asks to approve a token, change the amount from “Max” to the exact trade size. The LI.FI $11.6M hack only drained wallets with infinite approvals.
Set slippage tight
0.1–0.3% for major pairs. Setting it loose invites MEV. Tight first, loosen only if execution fails. Or use Fusion / CowSwap / Delta for zero-MEV signing.
Revoke approvals quarterly
Use revoke.cash to clear stale token approvals. Reduces attack surface dramatically. Routers get exploited — your approvals shouldn’t outlive your trades.
Pick an aggregator for your situation.
Eight profiles, one match each.
I trade on Solana
JupiterOwns the chain. >50% of all Solana DEX volume.
I’m on Ethereum mainnet
1inch FusionIntent-based, MEV-shielded, 350+ sources.
I get sandwiched a lot
CowSwapBatch auctions structurally block sandwich MEV.
I’m rebalancing a portfolio
OdosOnly aggregator with multi-input/multi-output swaps.
I need cross-chain (EVM + SOL)
LI.FIPowers MetaMask Bridges + Phantom multi-chain.
I need native BTC routing
RangoUTXO + EVM + Cosmos + Solana, all in one.
I want CEX-style limit orders
Velora DeltaIntent-based limit orders settle at exact target.
I’m new to DEXs
MatchaCleanest UI. 9M+ tokens searchable. Used by your wallet anyway.
7 questions readers ask us most.
What’s the single best DEX aggregator overall?
For multichain EVM trading, 1inch — Fusion intent mode is the most battle-tested combination of routing depth + MEV protection. For Solana, Jupiter (owns >50% of Solana DEX volume). No single “best” exists because chain and trade size both matter.
Are DEX aggregators free to use?
Most charge 0% router fee (1inch, Jupiter, Odos, KyberSwap, CowSwap on matched trades). 0x charges 0.15% on some pairs. Velora Delta takes 0.15% of surplus. KyberSwap charges 0.04–0.1%. You always pay gas. Routers that “look free” sometimes retain positive slippage instead — 1inch and KyberSwap do this (disclosed).
Which aggregator has the best MEV protection?
CowSwap (batch auctions, structurally MEV-proof). Then 1inch Fusion, UniswapX, Velora Delta v2.5 (all intent-based). The classic 1inch swap, KyberSwap default, and Odos all expose your trade to the public mempool unless you enable anti-MEV mode or Flashbots Protect.
What about the KyberSwap and LI.FI hacks?
KyberSwap lost $47M to a reentrancy attack on their Elastic CL pools in November 2023 — most user funds still unrecovered. LI.FI lost $11.6M in July 2024 due to a deployment error in GasZipFacet — only wallets with infinite approvals were drained, full post-mortem published. Use finite approvals only. Both protocols continue to operate but their scoring reflects the incidents.
Is 1inch better than Uniswap?
1inch routes through Uniswap and 349 other sources. On any trade large enough that liquidity matters ($1K+), 1inch’s Pathfinder will quote better than Uniswap alone. On micro-trades below $200, Uniswap direct is cheaper after gas overhead. UniswapX (Uniswap Labs’ intent product) competes directly on Uniswap-native tokens — worth comparing.
What happened to ParaSwap?
ParaSwap rebranded to Velora in April 2025. The PSP token was migrated 1:1 to VLR on Base. The same team operates the same product (now with Delta v2.5 intents). Some integrations still reference “ParaSwap” — they’re the same thing. velora.xyz is the current home.
Can I use a DEX aggregator from a hardware wallet?
Yes. Every aggregator on this list supports MetaMask, Rabby, Frame, and WalletConnect — all connect to Ledger and Trezor. For Solana (Jupiter), use Phantom or Backpack with hardware-wallet pairing. Hardware wallets don’t reduce smart-contract risk on the aggregator side, but they protect against malware-based key theft.
Honorable mentions — aggregators you might also consider.
Not in our top 9, but worth knowing about. Some are too specialized, some are newer, some are integrator-only and you’ll never use them directly.
UniswapX
Uniswap Labs’ answer to aggregators. Intent + filler auction. Spreads 1–5 bps on majors. Worth checking for Uniswap-native tokens.
Bebop (Wintermute)
Pure RFQ across 11 chains, $3.24B monthly. Unbeatable for large stablecoin and round-lot trades. Backed by Wintermute’s market-making depth.
OpenOcean
30+ chains including Solana, Aptos, Sui, Tron. Aggregates 300+ DEXs + Binance/OKX/Huobi orderbooks (unusual combo). Strong for exotic chains.
Symbiosis Finance
Cross-chain stablecoin specialist. Native cross-chain AMMs make it cheaper than bridge-based aggregators for stablecoin moves.
Squid (Axelar)
Built on Axelar GMP. Used by many wallets as default for Axelar-routed cross-chain swaps. Reliable but limited to Axelar’s chain set.
Hashflow
RFQ-only aggregator with deep market-maker partnerships. No slippage on quoted fills. Used by KyberSwap, others as RFQ source.
DefiLlama Swap
Meta-aggregator that fetches quotes from 1inch, ParaSwap/Velora, 0x, CoW, KyberSwap simultaneously and surfaces the best. The pro move for trades above $5K.
Drift Swap
Solana DEX with built-in aggregator. Not Jupiter-class on coverage but excellent for SOL spot + perps integration.
